<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Climate Change and the U.S.: Is the Environmental Protection Agency under-pricing carbon?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://triplecrisis.com/climate-change-and-the-u-s-is-the-environmental-protection-agency-under-pricing-carbon/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://triplecrisis.com/climate-change-and-the-u-s-is-the-environmental-protection-agency-under-pricing-carbon/</link>
	<description>Global Perspectives on Finance, Development, and Environment</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 05 Sep 2010 14:03:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Greg</title>
		<link>http://triplecrisis.com/climate-change-and-the-u-s-is-the-environmental-protection-agency-under-pricing-carbon/comment-page-1/#comment-69</link>
		<dc:creator>Greg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Feb 2010 05:25:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://triplecrisis.com/?p=243#comment-69</guid>
		<description>Frank, what do you think about the EPA mollifying the critics by simultaneously proposing a larger carbon tax and a reduction in other taxes?

In particular, what about replacing the Medicare payroll tax with a carbon tax, selling it to the public as a net reduction in taxes for many Americans and sound environmental policy?

This also has the benefit of being sound economically, correcting an externality, replacing a marketing-distorting payroll tax with a market-oriented Pigovian tax, and using health care funding to indirectly compensate those hurt by pollution.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Frank, what do you think about the EPA mollifying the critics by simultaneously proposing a larger carbon tax and a reduction in other taxes?</p>
<p>In particular, what about replacing the Medicare payroll tax with a carbon tax, selling it to the public as a net reduction in taxes for many Americans and sound environmental policy?</p>
<p>This also has the benefit of being sound economically, correcting an externality, replacing a marketing-distorting payroll tax with a market-oriented Pigovian tax, and using health care funding to indirectly compensate those hurt by pollution.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
