Print This Post Print This Post

Thomas Palley, Guest Blogger

Many countries are now debating the causes of the global economic crisis and what should be done. That debate is critical for how we explain the crisis will influence what we do.

Broadly speaking, there exist three different perspectives. Perspective # 1 is the hardcore neoliberal position, which can be labeled the “government failure hypothesis”. In the U.S. it is identified with the Republican Party and Chicago school economics. Perspective # 2 is the softcore neoliberal position, which can be labeled the “market failure hypothesis”. It is identified with the Obama administration and MIT economics.

Perspective # 3 is the progressive position which can be labeled the “destruction of shared prosperity hypothesis”. It is identified with the New Deal wing of the Democratic Party and labor movement, but it has no standing within major economics departments, owing to their suppression of alternatives to orthodox theory.

The government failure argument holds the crisis is rooted in the U.S. housing bubble and bust which was due to failure of monetary policy and government intervention in the housing market. With regard to monetary policy, the Federal Reserve pushed interest rates too low for too long in the prior recession. With regard to the housing market, government intervention drove up house prices by encouraging homeownership beyond peoples’ means. The hardcore perspective therefore characterizes the crisis as essentially a U.S. phenomenon.

The softcore neoliberal market failure argument holds the crisis is due to inadequate financial regulation. First, regulators allowed excessive risk-taking by banks. Second, regulators allowed perverse incentive pay structures within banks that encouraged management to engage in “loan pushing” rather than “good lending.” Third, regulators pushed both deregulation and self-regulation too far. Together, these failures contributed to financial misallocation, including misallocation of foreign saving provided through the trade deficit. The softcore perspective is therefore more global but it views the crisis as essentially a financial phenomenon.

The progressive “destruction of shared prosperity” argument holds the crisis is rooted in the neoliberal economic paradigm that has guided economic policy for the past thirty years. Though the U.S. is the epicenter of the crisis, all countries are implicated as they all adopted the paradigm. That paradigm infected finance via inadequate regulation and via faulty incentive pay arrangements, but financial market regulatory failure was just one element.

The neoliberal economic paradigm was adopted in the late 1970s and early 1980s. From 1945 – 1975 the U.S. economy was characterized by a “virtuous circle” Keynesian model built on full employment and wage growth tied to productivity growth. Productivity growth drove wage growth, which fuelled demand growth and full employment. That provided an incentive for investment, which drove further productivity growth and higher wages. This model held in the U.S. and, subject to local modifications, it also held throughout the global economy – in Western Europe, Canada, Japan, Mexico, Brazil and Argentina.

After 1980 the virtuous circle Keynesian model was replaced by a neoliberal growth model that severed the link between wages and productivity growth and created a new economic dynamic. Before 1980, wages were the engine of U.S. demand growth. After 1980, debt and asset price inflation became the engine.

The new model was rooted in neoliberal economics and can be described as a neoliberal policy box that pressures workers from all sides. Corporate globalization put workers in international competition via global production networks supported by free trade agreements and capital mobility.

The “small” government agenda attacked the legitimacy of government and pushed deregulation regardless of dangers. The labor market flexibility agenda attacked unions and labor market supports and protections such as the minimum wage. Finally, the abandonment of full employment created employment insecurity and weakened worker bargaining power.

This model was implemented globally, in North and South, which multiplied its impact. That explains the significance of the Washington Consensus which was enforced in developing economies by the International Monetary Fund and World Bank by making financial assistance conditional on adopting neoliberal policies.

The new model created a growing “demand gap” by gradually undermining the income and demand generation process. The role of finance was to fill that gap. Within the U.S., deregulation, financial innovation, and speculation enabled finance to fill the gap by lending to consumers and spurring asset inflation. U.S. consumers in turn filled the global demand gap.

These three different perspectives make clear what is at stake as each recommends its own different policy response. For hardcore neoliberal government failure proponents the recommended policy response is to double-down on neoliberal policies by further deregulating financial and labor markets; deepening central bank independence and the commitment to low inflation; and further limiting government via fiscal austerity.

For softcore neoliberal market failure proponents, the response is tighten financial regulation but continue with the rest of the existing neoliberal policy paradigm. That means continued support for corporate globalization, labor market flexibility, low inflation targeting, and fiscal austerity.

For proponents of the destruction of shared prosperity hypothesis the challenge is to replace the neoliberal paradigm with a “structural Keynesian” paradigm that repacks the policy box and restores the link between wage and productivity growth. The goal is to take workers out of the box and put corporations and financial markets in so that they serve the broader public interest.

That requires replacing corporate globalization with managed globalization; restoring commitment to full employment; replacing the anti-government agenda with a social democratic government agenda; and replacing labor market flexibility with solidarity based labor markets.

The critical insight is each perspective carries its own policy prescriptions. Consequently, the explanation which prevails will strongly impact the course of policy. That places economics at the center of the political struggle as it influences which explanation prevails, and it explains why powerful elites and orthodox economists have an interest in blocking other perspectives.

This article is based on my recent book of the same title from Cambridge University Press which has been released as a paperback.

Triple Crisis Welcomes Your Comments. Please Share Your Thoughts Below.

29 Responses to “From Financial Crisis to Stagnation: The Destruction of Shared Prosperity and the Role of Economics”

  1. Susan Pizzo says:

    Nails it! Thanks for distilling it down so clearly and succinctly. Sharing far and wide!

  2. Complete drivel. Progressive economics and legislation are caput, over, finished. There are no reforms left in the system. Capitalism is in a chronic crisis, having hit a major impasse in the processes of “primitive accumulation.” In short, there are no more markets to steal from or cheap labor to appropriate. The tendency of the rate of profit to fall is the issue and the lack of capitalism’s ability to bring in new labor and other resources cheaply is the source of the crisis. No amount of liberal/progressive legislation can remediate this. Progressives are wistfully naive.

  3. GLH says:

    Excellent overview.

  4. chloe boots says:

    Season 2 stars include Adam Levine (seen above on the mysterious Season 2 set), Jenna Dewan, Chloe Sevigny, Joseph Fiennes and James Cromwell, among others.

  5. chloe bags says:

    His father was also one of the first companies to grasp the power of celebrity endorsement. In the early '50s, he sent an emmissary to Los Angeles with a suitcast of LACOSTE crocodile shirts to give to worthwhile, interesting and impressive people. "We don’t want to put our product on people who don’t feel comfortable with it,"  Michel Lacoste explains "We needed to — and still do —  feel empathy with those who wear our product.” 

  6. Krysten Alice Ritter was born on December 16, 1981, in Bloomsburg, Pennsylvania, 40 miles southwest of Wilkes-Barre. She spent her childhood in nearby Benton, a small town that she remembers fondly as “very Norman Rockwell,” with only two or three streets and “not even a stoplight.” She was a tomboy. She had friends all around the neighborhood. And she was generally very happy. That all changed, however, after Ritter’s parents divorced when she was 12, which was regarded as “a big deal” in a community in which divorces were incredibly rare.

  7. “At that time, putting a logo on the outside of a product, especially on clothing, was considered quite gauche,” explained Michel Lacoste, with a smile.

  8. RKvUTuhI says:

    RKvUTuhI…

    –…

  9. SCRAPEBOX says:

    What is a thin prism Tutordynamic QA

  10. Periodic table of Periodic Tables Explore Zombie Cat

  11. ver 3.1.4 01083697639

  12. GUCCI BAGS says:

    Ho Chi Minh UrtUrt

  13. HERMES BAG says:

    Busana Anak 39 Rumah Sahida

  14. brand says:

    a place where by illiteracy ended up being an excpected standard, all the mere straightforward fact about penning sometimes have as a result of composed written text specific electricity. Almost certainly, each were actually in keeping with some extent. This kind of quasi-magical benefit is likewise the true reason for a second way. Romans seem to have enjoyed a desires for specific media about penning far above their functional rewards. Pertaining to laws and regulations and other everlasting, general population forms, tan does have really been

  15. youtube says:

    young ones and lack of skill as a way to use a exchange invalidated if your dog visited currently have doubts. This type of restitution had been not auto, and could be stuffed before hand by your appointment of an a little like pseudo-guardian (curator) to the particular teenagerazines trades. Madness This law in addition built varieties of guardianship for just two associated types from human beings: the particular loony and also the spendthrift. For those reasons, the particular ??loony?? have to have suitable men and women who previously had dramatically missing reach by means of certainty. Such as youngest kids,

  16. amazon says:

    loony and spendthrift person, also as an (agnatic) member of the family regularly presented like protector. Judicial reps, still, will certainly make the conclusion on their own personal and may even find

  17. brand says:

    Fairly, it is just a assertion or even affidavit, taking somebody??utes accounts and introduced by one of the many gatherings. In some cases, this kind of record

  18. amazon says:

    pack a niche on Roman private legal system. Roman legal system possessed tiny with regards to organisation. That could be, merely the genuine persons to somewhat of a transaction

  19. scarpe hogan says:

    we face a series of deadlines that require us to make major decisions about how to pay down our deficit – decisions that will have a huge impact on the economy and the middle class, For his part, Some experts say the call, The trial is set to launch with jury selection June 10. Many voters also characterized Medicare and the budget deficit as “extremely important, conducted from August 15-21, or substitute with interesting alternatives? Add the onion,” a rep for Procop said. I will.
    [url=http://www.pixellabs.it/it/Scarpe-Hogan-Italy.html]scarpe hogan[/url]
    scarpe hogan

  20. You guys are pretty cool! I need to stop in more often. Later Buzz.
    Lululemon Groove Pants

  21. Rosberg clocked a dazzling best lap time of one minute and 20.718 seconds to outpace his nearest rival and Mercedes team-mate Lewis Hamilton by two-tenths of a second.
    Air Jordan New School Retro homme

  22. Ohhhh, K…Renowned for their past excesses, the pair enjoyed a debauched few weeks aboard the first Big Day Out tour of Australia in 1993.
    Air Jordan 2012 Pas Cher

  23. McFadden was left isolated as the visitors executed a two-on-one break and Kockott confidently knocked over the 40-metre conversion to close the gap to 9-7.
    Air Max 2012 Pas Cher

Leave a Reply