Rent in a Warming World

James K. Boyce

What’s rent got to do with climate change? More than you might think.

Rent isn’t just the monthly check that tenants write to landlords. Economists use the term “rent seeking” to mean “using political and economic power to get a larger share of the national pie, rather than to grow the national pie,” in the words of Nobel laureate Joseph Stiglitz, who maintains that such dysfunctional activity has metastasized in the United States alongside deepening inequality.

When rent inspires investment in useful things like housing, it’s productive. The economic pie grows, and the people who pay rent get something in return. When rent leads to investment in unproductive activities, like lobbying to capture wealth without creating it, it’s parasitic. Those who pay get nothing in return.

Two other types of rent originate in nature rather than in human investment. Extractive rent comes from nature as a source of raw materials. The difference between the selling price of crude oil and the cost of pumping it from the ground is an example.

Protective rent comes from nature as a sink for our wastes. In the northeastern states of the U.S., for example, the Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative requires power plants to buy carbon permits at quarterly auctions. In this way, power companies pay rent to park CO2 emissions in the atmosphere. Similarly, green taxes on pollution now account for more than 5% of government revenue in a number of European countries. When polluters pay to use nature’s sinks, they use them less than when they’re free.

Four Types of Rent

Extractive and protective rents both originate in nature, but one promotes resource depletion, the other conservation. The resulting tension between these two types of rent from nature is becoming more visible in a warming world.

A daunting obstacle to climate policy arises from the vested interests of fossil fuel corporations in continuing to reap extractive rent. The current value of the world’s oil, coal and natural gas reserves is estimated at $27 trillion. Much of this will have to be written off if we phase out fossil fuels. “You can have a healthy fossil-fuel balance sheet, or a relatively healthy planet,” Bill McKibben observes. “You can’t have both.”

Creating protective rent by capping or taxing carbon emissions will shrink extractive rent. Fossil fuel corporations have shown themselves willing to fight hard to defend extractive rent. But the question of who will receive climate protective rent– and who will fight for it – remains up in the air.

One possibility is to return climate protective rent to the people via equal per capita dividends – a policy known as “cap and dividend” in the case of permits or “fee and dividend” in the case of taxes. Another is to give free permits to polluters and let them pocket the rent as windfall profits – a policy known as “cap and trade” but more accurately termed “cap and giveaway.” A third option is to let the government keep the money, as in the case of Europe’s green taxes.

Dividend proponents argue that recycling rent to the people is necessary to secure durable public support for climate policy as fossil fuel prices rise during the decades-long clean energy transition. Cap-and-giveaway proponents argue that surrendering the rent to fossil fuel corporations is necessary to neutralize their opposition to climate policy.

Underlying these strategies are very different beliefs about who owns nature’s sinks, and about politics. Dividends are based on the principle that the gifts of nature belong to everyone equally. Cap-and-giveaway is based on the premise that the same corporations that profit from extracting nature’s wealth ought to be paid to leave it in the ground.

Dividends make sense if we believe that it’s possible to enact a policy that benefits the majority of people financially as well as environmentally. Cap-and-giveaway makes sense if we believe that might makes right, and that the power of the people can never match the power of the corporations.

The serial defeats suffered by cap-and-trade bills in Washington have cast doubt on the political realism of “realpolitik” environmentalism. When the chips were down, the fossil fuel industry proved unwilling to buy into the new-rent-for-old deal.

The only way we’ll see a switch from extractive rents for corporations to protective rents for the public will be if ordinary people join together to make this happen. The small-d democratic politics that this will demand may seem like a quaint idea in the political climate of the early 21st century. But nothing less is required. To change the rent we get from nature, we must change who gets it.

Triple Crisis welcomes your comments. Please share your thoughts below.

11 Responses to “Rent in a Warming World”

  1. […] By Jim Boyce, originally posted at Triple Crisis. […]

  2. Vilhelmo says:

    Dear Mr. Boyce,

    You have conflated the term “rent”, a payment for the temporary use of a good or property, with “Economic Rent”, defined variously as, the portion of income paid to a factor of production in excess of its opportunity cost or (unearned) income with no counterpart in technologically necessary costs of production.

    I’m afraid to say that the end result is a confused mass of nonsense, falsehoods, misunderstandings & factual mistakes.

    The failure to accurately define the key concept & topic of one’s essay renders not but an exercise in futility.

    My criticisms are not intended to insult or offend but are offered constructively in the hope that it may spur you on to further study of an important & much neglected topic.

    The Wikipedia articles on “Economic Rent”, “Land Value Tax” & the “Law of Rent” are a good start.

    I sincerely hope that you take another stab at the topic.
    I wish you all the best.



  3. HotFlash says:

    I posted this comment at Naked Capitalism, where the article is cross-posted, but feel I should post it here at the origin, too.

    There are so many assumptions in this article that I hardly know where to begin. I think I will start with “When polluters pay to use nature’s sinks, they use them less than when they’re free.” I have never seen any evidence of that. Polluters will fight tooth and nail, of course, to not pay costs, but if they are forced to, they will simply pass them on to customers, eg, us. How’s the price of gas these days, Hmm? Next is that imposition and payment of ‘protective’ rents will magically offset the damage to ‘nature’ — gee, will a big fine to TEPCO fix Fukushima? My guess is the reason that a team of international experts hasn’t been parachuted in to clean up the mess there is because *NO ONE* on earth knows how. Payments to govt will never reflect the real damage and most likely just melt away (like the mortgage ‘settlement’ bucks did). Dividends to taxpayers are simply blood money, corps give you some bucks (which, of course, comes from the customers in the first place) and you have to shut up. And the prices, set presumably by negotiation betw ‘stakeholders’? Hmm, that should work out well. Who will represent ‘nature’?

    And last rant, promise, for today: Why are we still talking about ‘growth’ on a finite planet, the limits of whose carrying capacity are being assaulted from both directions? Wouldn’t stability be a better goal? And don’t get me started on what passes for ‘growth’!

  4. […] TripleCrisis This entry was posted in Survive Food Crisis and tagged Rent, Warming, World. Bookmark the permalink. ← Biofuels scandal + food prices. Biofuel crisis, biofuel oil, biofuel production, cars, algae, systems and basics introduction to facts about biofuels. Conference keynote speaker Patrick Dixon […]

  5. […] By James Boyce, Director, Program on Development, Peacebuilding, and the Environment at the Political Economy Research Institute (PERI) and Professor of Economics at the University of Massachusetts, Amherst. Originally published at Triple Crisis. […]

  6. Walt says:

    HotFlash (above) offers so many objections I hardly know where to begin.

    “Polluters will fight tooth and nail, of course, to not pay costs, but if they are forced to, they will simply pass them on to customers, eg, us.”

    Polluters dumping in the public domain NOW pass their costs on to us. Some costs are readily understood, for example, the electricity bill. Most others go unrecognized, for example, in visibility impairment by regional “haze,” and in increased asthma and mortality.

    Presently, the consumer doesn’t — and can’t — know the true cost of production.

    I suspect that Mr. Boyce touched a nerve, and that “HotFlash” is trying to run interference.

  7. Jeff Smith says:

    Of course people should pay for polluting, which would encourage them to find clean alternative fuels. But it’d also be a good idea to quit paying corporate welfare to polluters. And to de-tax wages and investments to facilitate tech-progress to clean fuels and engines.

    Another crucial part of the puzzle is to charge people for merely occupying land; doing that would encourage owners to use land efficiently. In cities, they’d develop vacant lots, parking lots, abandoned buildings, and under-sized buildings — they’d infill. Compact metro regions have buildings side by side and shorter trip distances so they both consume fewer resources and emit fewer pollutants.

    Cutting demand for fuel weakens the grip of oil companies while charging landowners is something localities can do; without waiting for federal action, cities and counties can shift their property tax off buildings, onto locations, and that would trigger the cascade of benefits for both people and planet. As does Aspen CO and Singapore, they could even generate a surplus and pay residents a dividend — way cool.

  8. ブランドコピー激安、ブランドコピー時計、ブランドコピー品当店のスーパーコピー商品は他店よりも質が高く、金額も安くなっております。ご購入する度、ご安心とご満足の届けることを旨にしておりますコピーブルガリ時計,コピーフランクミュラー時計,コピーシャネル時計,
    プラダ スーパーコピー,プラダ 財布 コピー,プラダ 新作 財布ブランド財布コピー,ブランド スーパーコピー 財布,プラダ スーパーコピー 財布,シャネル財布コピー,グッチ スーパーコピー 財布,エルメス スーパーコピー 財布,ルイヴィトン長財布コピー,スーパーコピー財布,エルメスコピー財布,各種のブランドはかばんをコピーします偽物ブランド,激安偽物,ブランド財布コピー,エルメス財布コピー,ブランドのコピーブランド財布,ルイ?ヴィトンブランド財布コピー,偽ブランドグッチ財布,D&G,コピー財布偽物,偽物時計コピー,時計,ボッテガベルト,,靴,その他のバッグコピー,ブランド財布激安,ブランド激安販売,偽ブランド激安市場,通販送料無料專門店 ルイヴィトンコピー 児玉店,当店ルイヴィトン コピー 財布、ルイヴィトン コピー バッグ 全MAX80%OFF!期間限定SALE。最短即日発送。送料無料ルイヴィトン コピー,ルイヴィトン コピー 財布,ルイヴィトン コピー バッグ

  9. 【新品】バッグ、財布、靴、帽子、アパレル、ベルト、その他小物 シャネル グッチ エルメス ロレックス ROLEX VUITTON CHANEL GUCCI HERMES ROLEX S級 VUITTON S級 CHANEL S GUCCI S級 HERMES S級 ROLEX AAA級 VUITTON AAA級 CHANEL AAA級 GUCCI AAA級 HERMES AAA級品 N級品ルイ ヴィトンS級品 シャネルS級品 グッチS級品 エルメスS級品 ロレックスS級品 ルイ ヴィトンAAA級品 シャネルAAA級品 グッチAAA級品 エルメスAAA級品 ロレックスAAA級品 ブランド バッグ 激安!! ブランド 財布 激安!! ブランド品を激安価格にて販売しております。 S級品 ブランド激安!! ブランド S級品激安!! AAA級 ブランド 激安!! ブランド 腕時計 激安!! S級品ブランド バッグ 激安!! S級品ブランド 財布 激安!! ルイヴィトンを激安で購入する方法 VUITTON財布を激安販売。 VUITTONバッグ 激安販売。 ヴィトン財布激安 S級ルイヴィトン財布 S級品ルイヴィトンバッグ ルイヴィトンバッグ激安!! ルイヴィトン財布激安!! ROLEX 腕時計激安!! CHANEL財布激安!! CHANELバッグ激安!! S級品 腕時計(Rolex)激安!! S級品 ブランド 腕時計 S級品ブランド 激安!! S級品ブランド 激安!!■スタイルが多い、品質がよい、価格が低い!■ 送料無料(日本全国) ご注文を期待しています!■信用第一、良い品質、低価格は■当社の商品は絶対の自信が御座います。激安、安心、安全にお届けします.品数豊富な商商品数も大幅に増え、品質も大自信です100%品質保証!満足保障!リピーター率100%!

  10. 100%実物写真ですし、品質が完璧です!”スーパーコピーブランド財布激安 偽物財布激安コピー ルイヴィトン財布偽物,偽物財布コピーエルバーキンコピースーパーコピー財布ブランド財布コピーブランドコピー激安バレンシアガ スーパーコピー激安ロレックス スーパーコピー時計ブランド財布激安 偽物財布激安コピー ルイヴィトン財布偽物,偽物財布コピーブランド激安市場-jck35販売:ブランド財布コピー,激安ブランド,財布コピー,偽ブランド,偽 ブランド財布,偽物ブランド財布,ブランドコピー,ヴィトンコピー,ルイヴィトン財布偽物, シャネル財布コピー,グッチ財布コピー,エルメス財布偽物,D&G 財布コピー,ボッテガ 財布 .2013年新作スーパーコピーロレックス,スーパーコピーロレックス時計通販スーパー コピー品その他の世界一流ロレックススーパーコピー時計品を扱っています。 ホームページをクリックして商品をご覧下さい.ロレックスコピー,業界No.1人気スーパーコピーロレックス腕時計専門販売ロレックスコピー(ROLEXスーパーコピー)のロレックス レプリカ販売専門店です。すべての商品は品質2年無料保証です,ロレックス デイトジャスト 偽物,人気満点ロレックス コピーn級品新作大特集
    激安 ブランドスーパーコピー新しいものを販売しています。ルイルイヴィトンコピー、グッチコピー、シャネルコピー、ブランドコピー、ブランドスコピー、ブランドコピー時計などルイヴィトンコピー 激安 ブランド、スーパーコピー、代引き対応、レプリカ、安心通販ルイヴィトン偽物、シャネル偽物、グッチ偽物、エルメス偽物、クロエ偽物、カルティエコピー、オメガコピー、IWCコピー楽天ヴィトンコピー屋

  11. スーパーコピーブランドなら当店で!
    人気スーパーコピーブランド時計激安通販専門店私達は長年の実体商店の販売経験を持って、先進とプロの技術を持って、高品質のスーパーコピー時計づくりに 取り組んでいます。最高品質のロレックス時計コピー、カルティエ時計コピー、IWC時計コピー、ブライトリング時計コピー、パネライ時計コピー激安販売中商品の数量は多い、品質はよい。海外直営店直接買い付け!★ 2015年注文割引開催中,全部の商品割引10% ★ 在庫情報随時更新! ★ 実物写真、付属品を完備する。 ★ 100%を厳守する。 ★ 送料は無料です(日本全国)!★ お客さんたちも大好評です★ 経営方針: 品質を重視、納期も厳守、信用第一!税関の没収する商品は再度無料にして発送します

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>